Archive for January, 2008
January 28th, 2008
The latest issue of Lewis & Clark Law School’s Environmental Law Review is now out.
Here are the articles published in Volume 37, Number 4 of Environmental Law Review, complete with links to the abstracts and full-text articles:
Symposium Introduction
Symposium Articles
Articles
Comments
New L&C Law Scholarship is a regular feature of BoleyBlogs! Here we announce new content from the Law Reviews of Lewis & Clark Law School, along with the latest publishing ventures of our own faculty, students and staff.
January 28th, 2008
Daniel J. Rohlf & Elizabeth C. Brodeen, Law, Science, and the Environment Forum: A Meeting of the Minds, 37 Environmental Law Review 931 (2007)
Symposium Introduction
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
David E. Adelman, The Art of the Unsolvable: Locating the Vital Center of Science for Environmental Law & Policy, 37 Environmental Law Review 935 (2007)
The image of science that has emerged from debates over environmental policy is distorted by expectations that are simultaneously too great and too modest. By clinging to a classical vision of science, critics set environmental science up for failure; by presuming that scientific results are primarily the product of ideology, they risk trivializing their value. This Article looks beyond the domain of environmental law to identify appropriate benchmarks for the role of science in environmental policymaking. A unique contribution of the Article is identification of finance theory and modeling as an exemplar for effective application of sophisticated scientific methods.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Mary Jane Angelo & Mark T. Brown, Incorporating Energy Synthesis into Environmental Law: An Integration of Ecology, Economics, and Law, 37 Environmental Law Review 963 (2007)
This interdisciplinary Article explores the viability of incorporating into environmental law and policy decision making the methods of emergy synthesis, a scientific methodology that integrates ecological and economic considerations. Specifically, this Article examines the viability of emergy synthesis in decision making by analyzing the advantages it offers and the mechanics of how to employ it in a variety of different contexts and using a number of existing environmental statutory frameworks. Through this examination, this Article demonstrates that emergy synthesis has the potential, not only to inform the law, but also to transform environmental decision making by providing a well-developed scientific methodology that addresses both ecological and economic considerations in a comprehensive manner.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Deborah M. Brosnan, Science, Law, and the Environment: The Making of a Modern Discipline, 37 Environmental Law Review 987 (2007)
Environmental law and science are uneasy companions. Issues of scientific versus legal definitions, standards, and interpretation of uncertainty abound. Which profession is best qualified to set standards and make decisions? Scholars and practitioners often call for bridging the gap in ways that maintain the separation of the disciplines. This Article argues that this approach does not work because it fails to recognize the reality that science and law are intertwined. Using examples from modern science and the Endangered Species Act, the Article shows how law and science influence each others thinking and advances. It calls for a modern new discipline that combines science and law and better prepares students for the future.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Robert G. Hetes, Science, Risk, and Risk Assessment and Their Role(s) Supporting Environmental Risk Management, 37 Environmental Law Review 1007 (2007)
The Environmental Protection Agency uses risk assessment as a key source of information for making decisions about managing risks to human health and the environment. This Article reviews the EPA’s implementation of risk assessment and its role in risk management decisions, with emphasis on the influence of science and policy on assessment procedures.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Thomas O. McGarity, The Complementary Roles of Common Law Courts and Federal Agencies in Producing and Using Policy-Relevant Scientific Information, 37 Environmental Law Review 1027 (2007)
Professor McGarity examines the desirability of, and impediments to, greater cooperation between regulatory agencies and common law courts in sharing scientific information related to health and environmental regulation, and common law toxic tort and products liability litigation.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
J.B. Ruhl, Reconstructing the Wall of Virtue: Maxims for the Co-Evolution of Environmental Law and Environmental Science, 37 Environmental Law Review 1063 (2007)
Environmental laws require administrative agencies responsible for implementing regulatory programs to depend heavily on science in support of their decision making, but adopt an outdated “linear” model for doing so. This Article uses the Endangered Species Act as a case study in the fallacies of the conventional approach and a platform for adopting a vision of agency decision making built around a dynamic conception of law-science questions and the positions of agency scientists and those responsible for exercising agency policy discretion.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Sidney A. Shapiro, OMB and the Politicization of Risk Assessment, 37 Environmental Law Review 1083 (2007)
In January 2007, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) withdrew its proposed draft Risk Assessment Bulletin (Bulletin), containing guidelines for the conduct of all risk assessments by government agencies, after being advised by a committee of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences that the guidelines were too flawed to be repairable. This Article argues that, while the failure of the Bulletin is attributable to OMB’s lack of scientific expertise, OMB’s effort to politicize the risk assessment process was also responsible for the failure. The Article considers what should be OMB’s role in the development of scientific guidelines in light of the potential for politicization of science in safety, health, and environmental regulation.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
January 25th, 2008
Paul Boudreaux, Biodiversity and a New “Best Case” for Applying the Environmental Statutes Extraterritorially, 37 Environmental Law Review 1107 (2007)
When should the presumption against the extraterritorial application of U.S. environmental laws be overcome? In this Article, Professor Boudreaux develops a “best case” for overcoming the presumption, when 1) the overseas conduct affects interests within the United States, such as the interest in preserving biodiversity for future needs, and 2) the conduct would not create a clash with the expectations of foreign governments or culture.
(abstract from Environmental Law Review)
|
|
