New L&C Law Scholarship: Lewis & Clark Law Review Volume 13, Number 3
October 8th, 2009The latest issue of Lewis & Clark Law School’s Lewis & Clark Law Review is now out.
Here are the articles published in Volume 13, Number 3 of Lewis & Clark Law Review, complete with links to the abstracts and full-text articles:
Symposium Articles
- We Have A “Purpose” Requirement If We Can Keep It by James F. Flanagan
- Forfeiture and Cross-Examination by Robert Kry
- Selective Originalism: Sorting Out Which Aspects of Giles’s Forfeiture Exception To Confrontation Were or Were Not “Established at the Time of the Founding” by Thomas Y. Davies
- Giles V. California: Avoiding Serious Damage To Crawford’s Limited Revolution by Robert P. Mosteller
- Making Constitutional the Permissive Inference In Gile V. California: Changing the Intent To Silence From “Purposely” To “Knowingly” by Douglas E. Beloof
- Forfeiture After Giles:The Relevance Of “Domestic Violence Context” by Deborah Tuerkheimer
- Giles V. California: A Personal Reflection by Richard D. Friedman
Notes & Comments
- Removing the Dead Hand On the Future: Recognizing Citizen Children’s Rights Against Parental Deportation by Alison M. Osterberg
- Adoption of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act In Oregon: The Right Time and the Right Reasons by Patrick Foran
- A Critical Look at the H-1B Visa Program and Its Effects On U.S. and Foreign Workers – A Controversial Program Unhinged From Its Original Intent by Christopher Fulmer
New L&C Law Scholarship is a regular feature of BoleyBlogs! Here we announce new content from the Law Reviews of Lewis & Clark Law School, along with the latest publishing ventures of our own faculty, students and staff.
