<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BoleyBlogs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs</link>
	<description>The legal research blog of Lewis &#038; Clark Law School's Boley Law Library</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review Volume 12, Number 1</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1170</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1170#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  latest issue of Lewis &#038; Clark Law School&#8217;s Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review is now out.
Here are the articles published in Volume 12, Number 1 of Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review, complete with links to the abstracts and full-text articles:
Symposium: Speech and the Public Schools After Morse v. Frederick

Our Libertarian Court: Bong Hits [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1170</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: Our Libertarian Court</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1169</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth W. Starr, Our Libertarian Court: Bong Hits and the Enduring Hamiltonian-Jeffersonian Colloquy, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 1 (2008)
The Supreme Court?s decision in Morse v. Frederick, otherwise known as the ?Bong Hits 4 Jesus? case, highlights the non-realization of Chief Justice Roberts?s goal of greater cohesion and unanimity among the nine Justices. Bong [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1169</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: How Will Morse v. Frederick Be Applied?</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1168</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1168#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erwin Chemerinsky, 
How Will Morse v. Frederick Be Applied?, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 17 (2008)
In 2007, the Supreme Court decided Morse v. Frederick, a 5-4 decision in which Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, decided that a student could be punished for displaying a banner with the words ?BONG HiTS 4 JESUS? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1168</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: Sanctionable Conduct</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1167</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1167#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sonja R. West, 
Sanctionable Conduct: How the Supreme Court Stealthily Opened the Schoolhouse Gate, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 27 (2008)
The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Morse v. Frederick signaled that public school authority over student expression extends beyond the schoolhouse gate. This authority may extend to any activity in which a student participates that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1167</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship:  Can There Really Be &#8220;Free Speech&#8221; in Public Schools?</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1166</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1166#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard W. Garnett,  Can There Really Be &#8220;Free Speech&#8221; in Public Schools?, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 45 (2008)
The Supreme Court?s decision in Morse v. Frederick leaves unresolved many interesting and difficult problems about the authority of public-school officials to regulate public-school students? speech. Perhaps the most intriguing question posed by the litigation, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1166</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: Bong Hits 4 Jesus as a Cautionary Tale of Two Cities</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1165</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Kanter, Bong Hits 4 Jesus as a Cautionary Tale of Two Cities, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 61 (2008)
In September of 1987, several high school students in Tigard, Oregon wore various T-shirts allegedly promoting the use of alcohol. In January of 2002, a number of students in Juneau, Alaska held up a banner [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1165</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: High-Value Speech and the Basic Educational Mission of a Public School</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1164</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Douglas Laycock, High-Value Speech and the Basic Educational Mission of a Public School: Some Preliminary Thoughts, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 111 (2008)
This Article assesses the alarming proposition at the core of the school?s argument in Morse v. Frederick: that a school has constitutional power to suppress any speech inconsistent with its self-defined ?basic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1164</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship:  A Self-Inflicted Wound</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1163</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1163#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Glazier,  A Self-Inflicted Wound: A Half-Dozen Years of Turmoil Over the Guantanamo Military Commissions, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 131 (2008)
President Bush?s November 2001 decision to try suspected terrorists by military commissions provoked immediate controversy that continues to the present day. The dispute is fueled by the adoption of judicial shortcuts unjustified [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1163</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship:  Damage Control</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1162</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John B. Dudrey, Damage Control: Two Proposals to Limit the Reach and Effect of Oregon?s Wrongful Discharge Tort, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 205 (2008)
The wrongful discharge tort is still a fairly new player on the employee rights legal scene. Generally speaking, the tort allows a discharged employee to sue his or her employer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1162</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New L&#038;C Law Scholarship: Quieting Disruption</title>
		<link>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1161</link>
		<comments>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1161#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[L&#038;C Law Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New L&#038;C Law Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christie S. Totten, Quieting Disruption: The Mistake of Curtailing Public Employees? Free Speech under Garcetti v. Ceballos, 12 Lewis &#038; Clark Law Review 233 (2008)
This Note critiques the United States Supreme Court?s 2006 decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos, which restricted public employees? free speech rights. Building on more than fifty years of jurisprudence, the Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawlib.lclark.edu/boleyblogs/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1161</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
